order vs. discrepancies from perfection (I.F.O.G.)note

A two years ago I circulated an E-mail entitled:

" I.F.O.G.; today I Figured Out God "
__________________________________

To summarise that e-mail:
After observing another man accidentally dumping a load of boxes off of a forklift because he was bothered by my proximity. I deduced that our ***notion of god was actually*** "the sum of the thought traffic interaction; of humans and nature. Furthermore this could be placed in an equation:
E=mc2=(Human Thought traffic Interaction)

To further this Idea:

At a meeting I observed a man accidentally spill a cup of coffee as he reached acrosss a table. Similar to newton watching the apple fall, I saw a glimpse of a force of nature in that moment.

I will assertively state that this action,(reaching)should have been perfect in a normal instance. Therefore the spill should be seen as a deficiency to the normal order. The application of this,(correct),way of percieving; now allows for a goal of achieving wondrous results in any endeavour by implementing symetry,(balance neutrality,etc) to thought traffic interaction.

For one example; You could achieve greatly improved results, efficiency, and experience's at meetings, by implementing a process such as this.

ambitious science/ Threading into the Future

The following project has been put on hold: due to my inability to find the time to concentrate on it.




(I am back in North America; and I have a project to announce.

My experience with dreams of the future, and most specifically my fortunate ability to discern the memories and subfacets of the same; has opened up a possibility for following information threads into knowledge of future event scenario's.

This will be a project I will be working on when I have the time.
As an example I will state that, "emotions" and, "Media", have had a traceable influence on what I dream and subsequent occurrences in the post, or "deja vu" reality.

The concept of altering the future is deemed to be problematic in science fiction writings. However their is an error in that logic that is extremely misleading, or may only affect the past not the future. I have encountered evidence, that it is more like a process of fine tuning a future! Hence we are talking about something amenable to Engineering methods. "Psycic Engineering", of the future; is one descriptive view of the goal I am pressing towards.)